As is often the case with this blog, I’m writing about something sometime after the initial hype and attention surrounding it has died down a little, in this case the Netflix drama Adolescence, which caused such a stir that there were memes about people being arrested for not watching it, reflecting the reaction by certain people in the media to Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch having not watched the show.
So widespread was the attention given to the series that Prime Minister Kier Starmer advocated it being shown to school children across the country. Considering that the main focus of this blog is issues relating to men and boys, I felt I at least needed to watch the series to see what all the hype was about.
The series depicts the case of a 13 year old boy named Jamie being arrested for the killing of a girl of the same age named Katie which appeared to have been sparked by comments made online.
The series is divided into four episodes all about an hour long and which were filmed as a single, uncut take. I’ll write briefly about each episode individually so be prepared for SPOILERS if you are at all interested in watching the series.
Episode 1:
The first episode shows the arrest of Jamie early in the morning following the killing of Katie the evening before. We follow the DCI and DC as they and the police storm into Jamie’s family home to arrest him and take him to the police station. The camera follows Jamie as he is questioned by the police officer at reception where he chooses his father, Eddie, played by Stephen Graham, as his ‘appropriate adult’ and then subsequently meets the solicitor assigned to him. Following this, we see part of Jamie’s physical inspection and then finally his questioning by the DCI and DC about the murder. Jamie frequently denies to his father and the police that he killed Katie but the police eventually show Jamie and his father footage of Jamie attacking Katie on CCTV.
I think the single take technique works pretty well here as we, the audience, are like a fly on the wall watching the police procedural methods leading to Jamie’s interrogation at the end of the episode.
Episode 2:
The second episode, titled ‘Day 3’, follows the DCI and DC as they walk around Jamie’s school to question Jamie’s friends and one of Katie’s friends about the incident and what led to it. We witness the dysfunctions of the school as many of the children are noisy and undisciplined, the teachers are ineffective or not interested and the children spend most of the time watching videos rather than being taught by the teacher. Near the end of the episode, the DCI’s son, Adam, who attends the school, informs his father that Katie had messaged Jamie on Instagram and sent him emojis such as an exploding red pill implying that Jamie was an incel or involuntary celibate. This was in response to Jamie posting explicit comments about female models. It is revealed at the end of the episode that Jamie got a knife from his friend Tommy which may have been the murder weapon.
In this episode, I thought the single take style felt much more of a gimmick and was not really needed here. There were some moments in the episode which seemed to me to have been written simply to utilise the single take technique such as the fire alarm going off leading us to follow the characters outside. Later, the DCI chases after Jamie’s friend Tommy after he jumps out of the (ground floor) window when the DCI decides to question him again. This moment also seemed like it was just included to make use of the single take to create some action.
That being said, the episode concludes with an ambitious tracking shot of the camera moving above the school (by drone I assume) and moving towards the site of Katie’s death where Eddie, who only appears at the end of the episode, leaving some flowers at the memorial made for her.
Episode 3:
The third episode, which appears to have generated the most attention online as well as in the media, takes place 7 months after the murder and follows a psychologist named Briony, played by Erin Doherty, interviewing Jamie at a ‘training facility’ where she is providing an assessment of his case. After some initial jovial talk, Jamie becomes aggressive and threatening at times and tries to intimidate the psychologist. Briony asks him about his relationship with his father and his feelings about masculinity. Jamie mentions his father taking him to football matches although he did not enjoy it and there is some more talk about the online comments Katie had sent to Jamie. There is mention of the ’80-20 rule’ which Jamie agrees with. It is revealed in this episode that Katie’s comments on Jamie’s Instagram were in response to Jamie asking Katie out after a topless photo of her was circulated, causing Jamie to believe that she would feel vulnerable and accept. Instead, Katie rejected Jamie. At the end of the episode, Briony tells Jamie that this would be their last encounter which causes Jamie to becomes agitated and aggressive again.
From my own limited experience of encountering mental health patients, Jamie appeared to me to display symptoms of a personality disorder or some other psychological problem which makes the idea of Jamie being radicalised by the ‘manosphere’ unconvincing. This also makes the idea of Jamie being a representative of modern teenage boys also unconvincing and a little sensationalised.
Episode 4:
The final episode takes place on Eddie’s 50th birthday, 13 months after the killing and follows Jamie’s parents as they try to deal with the aftermath of their son’s crime. The atmosphere is initially light-hearted until Eddie and Manda’s daughter Lisa discovers that some other boys had spray-painted the word ‘nonce’ on Eddie’s work van. He decides to go to a hardware shop to buy some cleaning products to wipe the spray paint off but buys some paint instead. The man in the shop recognises him and says that he believes that his son is innocent. This causes Eddie to become agitated, which is exacerbated when he sees the boys who spray-painted his car outside the shop and attacks them. On the drive home, Jamie calls his father to wish him Happy Birthday and tells him he’s decided to change his plea from innocent to guilty. When the family return home Eddie questions if he is responsible for Jamie’s actions and we learn that Eddie’s father beat him as a child.
The series ends with Eddie bursting into tears as he looks around Jamie’s bedroom and tucks in a teddy bear on Jamie’s bed, essentially a surrogate for Jamie, and apologises to it.
Similar to Episode 2, the use of a single take again felt a bit unnecessary in this episode although it worked better here than in the school.
Summary:
Overall, Adolescence is a mini-series that has more style than substance. While the use of a single continuous shot in all four episodes was certainly impressive, it worked better in the self-contained environments of the police station and facility shown respectively in the first and third episodes than in the second and fourth ones. This technique is also not as ground-breaking as some people think. Alfred Hitchcock, after all, used a similar style in his film Rope back in 1948, albeit as a series of long takes stitched together. Other films which have used the same technique include 1917, Russian Ark and Boiling Point (which also stars Stephen Graham).
Similarly, while the acting was impressive for the most part, the content was fairly pedestrian. As I noted above, Jamie seemed to have some psychological issues which would contribute to his violent crime, but the series and the general reaction towards it implies that Jamie was a normal boy who turned violent by what he was viewing online. As Janice Fiamengo notes in her review of the show on her Substack, despite references to the ‘manosphere’ and Andrew Tate, the show never explores these topics beyond a brief mention, and takes aim at masculinity instead. The series implies that Jamie’s aggressive behaviour is a product of seeing his father’s own outbursts of anger, such as on one occasion destroying the family shed.
A cynical person might suggest that the inclusion of conversations about the internet was simply a way to draw viewers to the show rather than attempting any meaningful explanation to issues that affect boys like Jamie.
Adolescence could have easily just been a TV drama about a teenage boy killing a teenage girl and how his parents and the community react to it; the kind of drama you might watch on a Sunday evening on ITV. It may have received acclaim for its technical achievements and acting but wouldn’t have had the hype surrounding it had it not jumped on the toxic masculinity bandwagon.
In short, don’t feel like you have to watch this series unless you absolutely want to.
